By Nate Raymond
September 5, 20252:30 AM GMT+2Updated September 5, 2025
BOSTON, Sept 4 (Reuters) – A federal appeals court on Thursday declined to allow U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration to refuse to issue passports to transgender and nonbinary Americans that reflect their gender identities.
Mark Hallam09/04/2025September 4, 2025
A non-binding opinion, issued ahead of a full case at the European Court of Justice, recommends that EU member states should be obliged to issue ID cards corresponding with a trans person’s “lived gender identity.”
Source: https://www.dw.com/en/bulgaria-asked-to-recognize-trans-lived-gender-identity/a-73880461
Imane Khelif ‘has right to appeal’ [before the Court of Arbitration for Sports] over genetic sex tests but will miss world championships
More:
Burkina Faso passes law outlawing homosexual practices
John Silk AP, AFP, Reuters, dpa, KNA09/02/2025September 2, 2025
Burkina Faso’s parliament has passed a law banning homosexuality with offenders facing two to five years in prison. The amended family code was approved in a unanimous vote in the West African country.
Source: https://www.dw.com/en/burkina-faso-passes-law-outlawing-homosexual-practices/a-73855503
X enabled online abuse against LGBTQ+ community in Poland, report finds
Amnesty International on Monday released a report finding that X (formerly Twitter) allowed for the spread of technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TfGBV) against LGBTQ+ people in Poland.
The report highlights that Elon Musk relaxed the X’s Community Guidelines regarding the content allowed on the platform after taking ownership. Consequently, X has become “awash with content constituting TfGBV” requiring “urgent, wide-ranging reforms”. Alia Al Ghussain, Amnesty International Researcher and Advisor on technology and human rights, highlighted that “through inadequate content moderation practices and a lack of human rights due diligence, X has contributed to human abuses against members of Poland’s LGBTI community.”
Amnesty International’s research found that the examination of the tweets unveiled that “homophobic and transphobic content is highly prevalent on X, particularly for accounts that follow politicians who do not support the rights of LGBTI people.” Importantly, the algorithm responsible for the “For You” feed (also known as the recommender system) aims to increase user engagement. Therefore, content that is likely to garner interaction will be displayed to users. Amnesty International classified X’s business model as “surveillance-based” because it is dependent on intrusive data collection so that advertisements reach the target audience, similar to other social media platforms.
The group notes that X’s lack of funding in Polish language content moderation has led to the failure of handling TfGBV content. Only two Polish-speaking content moderators are “responsible for covering a population of 37.45 million people and 5.33 million X users.” The report states that “the combination of poor resourcing, policy, and practice has contributed to X becoming a platform awash with hateful content” against the LGBTQ+ community.
Furthermore, Amnesty International argues that X has not complied with the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA). Article 34(1) of the DSA states that providers of Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) must “diligently identify, analyse and assess any systemic risks in the [EU] stemming from the design or functioning of their service and its related systems, including algorithmic systems, or from the use made of their services.”
Article 34(1)(b) highlights that the risk assessment must regard whether there are systemic human rights risks by considering whether any fundamental rights, as enshrined by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU), are at risk. This includes the right to human dignity (Article 1 CFREU), right to respect for private and family life (Article 7 CFREU), right to the freedom of expression and information, including the freedom and pluralism of the media (Article 11 CFREU), and non-discrimination (Article 21 CFREU). The organization emphasizes that X has harmed the ability of LGBTQ+ individuals “to freely express themselves, to live free from discrimination and to feel safe in Polish society”.
Previously, the European Commission launched an investigation under the DSA against X in December 2023 and required X to give information on its recommender system in January 2025. Amnesty International states that the European Commission’s investigations should include X’s ability to effectively tackle the risk of TfGBV.
The post X enabled online abuse against LGBTQ+ community in Poland, report finds appeared first on JURIST – News.
GRANDE CONFÉRENCE CEDIDAC: DROITS DES ATHLÈTES ET CEDH – L’arrêt de Grande Chambre Semenya c. Suisse, Lausanne 9 octobre 2025
ANDREAS ZÜND, JUGE À LA COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME
DANIEL RIETIKER, CHEF D’UNITÉ À LA COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME
Nearly half of Russian LGBTQ people faced violence or threats in 2024, new report finds
More: https://meduza.io/en/feature/2025/05/19/we-automatically-look-over-our-shoulders
45 UN experts renew call for gender centered approach to reach human rights goals
45 UN human rights experts reaffirmed on Thursday that gender must remain central to the fight for equality and human rights worldwide.
The statement was signed by UN special procedure mandate holders from various countries, jointly emphasizing that “binary conceptions of sex” result in an incomplete picture of the “social and cultural factors that shape identity and lived experience.” Thus, the experts urge that “[g]ender-based discrimination must be addressed alongside sex-based discrimination.”
According to the experts, employing a gender-based perspective advances human rights and equality goals due to a more comprehensive appreciation of how “roles, expectations, and hierarchies manifest in education, health, culture, at the workplace or with respect to social, economic, and political opportunities.” As such, the experts call on states and other stakeholders to reaffirm their commitment to gender equality and integration of a gender-based practice in international law. This call is consistent with the goals and objectives outlined in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 5 on gender equality.
The value of recognizing intersectional forms of discrimination, including those based on sexual orientation and gender identity, was also supported by the work of the Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). The current Independent Expert mandate is held by South African scholar Graeme Reid and was recently renewed by the UN Human Rights Council.
The UN experts’ statement comes amidst issues of gender-based discrimination across borders. In mid-July, the UN highlighted persistent gender gaps in sports, calling on member states to address gender inequalities. More specifically, in the US, several states, including Tennessee and Oklahoma, have made efforts to ban gender-affirming care for minors. Meanwhile, the UN also recently condemned the Taliban’s “gender apartheid” in Afghanistan, urging that dismantling these barriers is key to reaching gender equality.
The post 45 UN experts renew call for gender centered approach to reach human rights goals appeared first on JURIST – News.
USA announce that it will not participate in the United Nations’ Universal Periodic Review (UPR) scheduled for November 7
| This week, Laurel Sprague, Research Director and Blachford/Cooper Distinguished Scholar at the Williams Institute, was one of six U.S. participants in the pre-sessions for the United Nations’ Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United States. The UPR requires UN member states to report approximately every four and a half years on their human rights progress and receive recommendations from other states for continued improvement. In her testimony, Laurel addressed the U.S. government’s failures to meet its human rights obligations toward LGBTQ people since the last review in 2020 and offered recommendations for the reviewing states. On Wednesday, the U.S. announced that it would not participate in the UPR scheduled for November 7. “The State Department’s decision not to participate in this review marks a reversal of U.S. leadership on LGBTQ rights and sets a dangerous precedent,” Laurel said from Geneva. “This decision tells governments that they can disregard human rights recommendations, which threatens to further undermine human rights globally. It puts minority groups—including sexual and gender minorities—at greater risk and removes a key accountability process for anyone needing to defend themselves against government overreach.” |
USA: Scholars file amicus brief with the Supreme Court in conversion therapy case
| Scholars file amicus brief with the Supreme Court in conversion therapy case On August 27, Williams Institute scholars, represented by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the Supreme Court in Chiles v. Salazar. The case was brought by Kaley Chiles, a mental health professional in Colorado, who is challenging the state’s ban on conversion therapy for youth. Chiles contends that the law restricts her ability to provide comprehensive counseling consistent with her and her clients’ religious beliefs, in violation of the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause. The brief presents research showing that conversion therapy is ineffective and can cause serious harm to vulnerable LGBTQ youth, such as increased risks of suicidal ideation, depression, anxiety, physical health problems, financial hardships, and social isolation. The brief also supports Colorado’s authority to regulate the medical profession to prevent such harms. Read the brief |
| IMPACT |
International and Comparative SOGIESC Law - Professor Andreas R Ziegler 