Author Archives: Andreas R. Ziegler

EU: ‘Call It Hate’ project findings published with video and blogs

‘Call It Hate’ project findings published with video and blogs

The EU-funded consortium project ‘Call it Hate’ has ended as of December 2019. The project team shared a series of videos from the closing conference and two blog posts on the International Network for Hate Studies website. The author Dr Piotr Godzisz discusses the research results in his first blog post “Understanding Attitudes toward LGBT People as Victims of Crimes” and he introduces the context effect in attitude surveys in his second blog post “Context effect in the study on the perceptions of violence against LGBT people”. The context effect was used to analyse the gender dimension of respondents’ attitudes towards the victims of anti-LGBT violence.
Read the research book published by ‘Call it Hate’.

Job vacancies at IGLYO

Job vacancies at IGLYO

The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer & Intersex (LGBTQI) Youth and Student Organisation (IGLYO) has two job vacancies: You can apply for the Policy & Research Officer position until 17 February and for the Senior Finance Officer position until 16 February. Both posts are full-time.
Read more and apply for Policy & Research Officer.
Read more and apply for Senior Finance Officer.

Legal victory for trans community in Kosovo

Legal victory for trans community in Kosovo

After a two-year court battle in Kosovo and a legal decision in the Basic Court of Pristina affirming his human rights, Blert Morina was finally able to change his name and gender marker in identity documents on 20 January. This is a landmark decision for Blert, transgender persons, and the whole LGBT community in Kosovo as it was the second such case in which Kosovo’s courts have ruled in favour of a trans person’s gender recognition.
Read more on a news article.

Social Welfare Center in Zagreb, Croatia has rejected a foster care application submitted by a gay couple, who are life partners in Croatia, although this is in contradiction with the Croatian Administrative Court’s binding ruling of 19 December 2019

Social Welfare Center in Zagreb, Croatia has rejected a foster care application submitted by a gay couple, who are life partners in Croatia, although this is in contradiction with the Croatian Administrative Court’s binding ruling of 19 December 2019

On 28 January, the Social Welfare Center in Zagreb, Croatia has rejected a foster care application submitted by a gay couple, who are life partners in Croatia, although this is in contradiction with the Croatian Administrative Court’s binding ruling of 19 December 2019. The December judgment, the result of a two-year court proceeding, states that life partners should be considered on equal footing as other types of families. Not only this is a clear case of discrimination based on sexual orientation in violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, but a blatant disregard of the rule of law, which is one of the priorities of Croatian Presidency of the Council of the European Union.
Read more.

Council of Europe: Parliamentary Assembly adopted a resolution on the protection of freedom of religion or belief in the workplace without laying the groundwork for legalisation of homophobic, transphobic, interphobic, or anti-SRHR discrimination

Council of Europe: Parliamentary Assembly adopted a resolution on the protection of freedom of religion or belief in the workplace without laying the groundwork for legalisation of homophobic, transphobic, interphobic, or anti-SRHR discrimination

On 29 January, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe adopted a resolution on the protection of freedom of religion or belief in the workplace. Beforehand, a coalition of ILGA-Europe, IPPF European Network, European Humanist Federation, European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights, and Center for Reproductive Rights successfully lobbied, along with numerous allied Parliamentarians from across the region, to block dangerous language on “reasonable accommodation” from being adopted within the resolution text by the Council of Europe. As a result a resolution supporting protection of freedom of religion and belief in the workplace, with continued reflection of anti-discrimination law was adopted – one that protects human rights without laying the groundwork for legalisation of homophobic, transphobic, interphobic, or anti-SRHR discrimination.


More information about the resolution and voting results.

Switzerland: National LGBTIQ+ Survey 2019

National LGBTIQ+ Survey 2019

Tabea Hässler & Léıla Eisner

In this report we will present the results of a large national survey of LGBTIQ+ people (i.e., individuals identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans*, intersexual, queer, and other sexual or gender minorities) in Switzerland. Despite changes toward greater acceptance and equality, LGBTIQ+ people in Switzerland still suffer from discrimination and face structural inequalities. For example, marriage for same-sex couples (sometimes called same-sex marriage) and joint adoption are currently not legal and LGBTIQ+ people are not protected against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Attachments and links

Publication Date:

30 January 2020

Themes:

Equality, Diversity, Discrimination

Disciplines:

Social Sciences, Economics and Law

Institutions:

Université de Lausanne(Switzerland)

The Swiss Government wants to quickly open marriage to all couples, but…wants to maintain certain discriminatory rules

The Swiss Government wants to quickly open marriage to all couples, but...wants to maintain certain discriminatory rules
Bern, 29.01.2020 - The Federal Council wants to eliminate the unequal treatment of homosexual couples (in general). This is why he supports the project that the Legal Affairs Committee of the National Council (CAJ-N) developed in response to parliamentary initiative 13.468 "Civil marriage for all", as he announced during its meeting of the January 29, 2020. The question of opening marriage to homosexual couples shall be separated from certain family issues. The other questions, in particular that of access to medically assisted procreation, still need to be studied in depth (according to the Government) and will be dealt with separately.

Details in French or German: https://www.admin.ch/gov/fr/accueil/documentation/communiques.msg-id-77927.html