Category Archives: Allgemein

USA: Tennessee legislature passes bill criminalizing adults aiding minors in receiving gender-affirming care

USA: Tennessee legislature passes bill criminalizing adults aiding minors in receiving gender-affirming care

The Tennessee House of Representatives approved a bill on Thursday that criminalizes adults who knowingly take minors away from Tennessee to help them receive gender-affirming medical procedures without the consent of their parents.

The companion bill was introduced to the Tennessee House of Representatives on January 29, 2024 as HB 2310 by Representative Bryan Richey and to the Tennessee Senate on January 31. Senator Janice Bowling introduced SB 2782 in the Senate. The bill originally allowed parents to sue any adult who “knowingly remove a minor from [Tennessee] without the consent of a parent of the minor” for the purpose of aiding the minor to receive medical procedures for making the minor better able to identify with a sex they are not.

Since then, however, the Senate and House have both added their own amendments to the bill. The Senate’s amendment added that in a civil action based on violating the bill, “[The] plaintiff may recover from the person: (A) Compensatory damages; (B) Punitive damages; and (C) Reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, and expenses.” It also made violating the bill a Class C felony, which has the sentencing range for a first-time offender as three to six years imprisonment and, for a repeat offender, can be as high as 10 to 15 years imprisonment. The House’s amendment most notably added that the “common carrier transporting passengers for hire” as part of their business activities are exempt from the bill.

The Senate initially rejected the House’s amendment. In order to resolve their dispute, both the Senate and House appointed their own Conference Committees. Both committees ended up approving the bill and its amendments, with the Senate having a 2-1 vote and the House having a 3-1 vote.

According to The Tennessee Conservative, Richey stated that the bill is simply a “parents’ rights bill.” Tennessee advocates for Planned Parenthood see the bill as an unconstitutional attack on personal autonomy. Planned Parenthood went on to say:

[T]he exclusion of the term ‘legal guardian’ and inclusion of only the consent of ‘a parent’ poses the likely possibility that this bill would disproportionately impact youth who do not have parents or accessible parents, youth who likely are members of multiple marginalized identities and facing heightened social and health inequities.

The bill now awaits approval from the Tennessee Governor Bill Lee for the bill to become law in the state.

The post Tennessee legislature passes bill criminalizing adults aiding minors in receiving gender-affirming care appeared first on JURIST – News.

USA: Alabama legislature advances bill that restricts books ‘harmful to minors’ in public libraries

USA: Alabama legislature advances bill that restricts books ‘harmful to minors’ in public libraries

The Alabama House of Representatives voted 72-28 to pass HB 385, which prohibits public libraries from providing materials that are “harmful to minors” or “obscene.” The bill, which passed on Thursday, will now go to the Alabama Senate.

Under the bill, it is a public nuisance for public libraries to provide obscene or harmful materials to minors. The bill defines harmful to minors as appealing “to the prurient interest of minors,” describing or depicting sexual conduct or lacking “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.” Additionally, the bill defines obscene as appealing “to the prurient interest,” depicting or describing sexual content in a “patently offensive” way or lacking “serious literary, artistic, political,
or scientific value.”

Generally, a public nuisance refers to any conduct that interferes with the rights of the public and is usually enforced by a state attorney general. Under HB 385, the state attorney general or district attorney can sue for violations. Additionally, if municipalities pass authorizing legislation, county or municipal attorneys may also enforce the law. 

The bill also removes the public library exemption from the state’s criminal obscenity laws. However, the bill keeps the exemption for college and university libraries. If HB 285 is passed into law, public librarians could be guilty of misdemeanors for violating the state’s criminal obscenity provisions.

The US Constitution’s First Amendment does not protect obscene language. This means that state governments are free to pass laws that limit obscene speech. In the US Supreme Court case Miller v. California, the court used a three-prong test to determine if language is obscene. Under this test, courts look first at whether “the average person, applying contemporary community standards” would find that the work, “taken as a whole,” appeals to “prurient interest.” Next, the courts look at whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law. Lastly, courts look at whether the work, “taken as a whole,” lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.

Alabama is not alone in passing legislation that restricts public libraries from providing harmful materials to minors. Earlier this month, the Idaho Senate approved House Bill No. 710, which declares that a school or public library shall not promote or make available any conduct that is deemed harmful to minors. Additionally, last month, the American Library Association announced that censorship demands and book ban attempts in public libraries and schools hit a record high in 2023.

The post Alabama legislature advances bill that restricts books ‘harmful to minors’ in public libraries appeared first on JURIST – News.

Council of Europe: Anti-torture annual report: Rights of transgender prisoners in focus

Council of Europe: Anti-torture annual report: Rights of transgender prisoners in focus

The Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) has issued a set of standards and recommendations to European prisons aimed at ensuring that transgender prisoners, a highly vulnerable segment of the prison population, are treated with respect and protected from the risks of ill-treatment

More: https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/anti-torture-annual-report-rights-of-transgender-prisoners-in-focus

Trans Wrestler Nyla Rose Competed Against a Cis Wrestler. The State of Oklahoma Lost It

Trans Wrestler Nyla Rose Competed Against a Cis Wrestler. The State of Oklahoma Lost It

The Oklahoma State Athletic Commission issued a formal warning that misgendered Rose and reprimanded her for violating rules that prohibit athletic competitions “between males and females,” as defined solely by chromosomes.

More: https://www.them.us/story/trans-wrestler-nyla-rose-competed-against-cis-wrestler-oklahoma

USA: New Title IX regulation provides protections against discrimination for 3.6 million LGBT students 

USA: New Title IX regulation provides protections against discrimination for 3.6 million LGBT students

The U.S. Department of Education released the final rule to Title IX today. The rule explicitly provides protections for LGBTQI+ students from discrimination, harassment, and assault based on their sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics in educational programs that receive federal funding. However, the regulations leave some issues unresolved, including transgender sports participation.  This rule protects an estimated 3.6 million students in the U.S. who identify as LGBT, including about 300,000 who identify as transgender. Several Williams Institute studies have documented widespread and pervasive harassment and bullying of LGBTQ+ students at school A recent study found that one-third of LGBTQ people experienced bullying, harassment, or assault at college, compared to 19% of non-LGBTQ people.
Reported by the UCLA Williams Institute

See: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

See also: https://www.them.us/story/bidens-title-ix-rules-lgbtq-students-not-trans-student-athletes

USA: West Virginia’s Trans Sports Ban Discriminates Against Trans Teen, Appeals Court Rules

USA: West Virginia’s Trans Sports Ban Discriminates Against Trans Teen, Appeals Court Rules

See: https://www.them.us/story/west-virginias-trans-sports-ban-discriminates-trans-teen-appeals-court-ruling

_________________________________________________________________

The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled on Tuesday that West Virginia’s ban on transgender girls competing on girls’ sports teams violates a transgender student’s rights under Title IX.

The law, which is known as the “Save Women’s Sports Act,” prohibits individuals who were assigned male at birth from competing on girls’ athletic teams. The act also says, however, that it shall not be “construed to restrict the eligibility of any student to participate in any… teams or sports designated as ‘males,’ ‘men,’ or boys.’” The court therefore found that the law prohibits only one category of students, transgender girls, from participating in sports teams that correspond with their gender.

The plaintiff, a 13-year-old transgender girl named Becky Pepper-Jackson, filed suit against the West Virginia State Board of Education in 2021. She claimed the act violated her right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment as well as her rights under Title IX, a federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in federally-funded educational programs.

The court found for the plaintiff on the Title IX claim, stating the plaintiff demonstrated that “applying the Act to her would treat her worse than people to whom she is similarly situated, deprive her of any meaningful athletic opportunities, and do so on the basis of sex.”  The court stated, “‘[E]motional and dignitary harm… is legally cognizable under Title IX’ and it requires no feat of imagination to appreciate the ‘[t]he stigma of being’ unable to participate on a team with one’s friends and peers.” The ruling also stated that the act “goes further by requiring [the plaintiff] to take on additional harms to avoid forfeiting the ability to play school sports altogether.” Provided that the plaintiff has been publicly living as a girl for more than five years, changed her name and sex on her birth certificate, takes puberty-blocking medication, and has only participated on girls’ sports teams, the court found that “offering [her] a ‘choice’ between not participating in sports and participating only on boys teams is no real choice at all” and would “directly contradict the treatment protocols for gender dysphoria.”

The court declined to overrule the law or prohibit government officials from creating and drawing the line between separate teams for boys and girls. The ruling stated, “We also do not hold that Title IX requires schools to allow every transgender girl to play on girls’ teams, regardless of whether they have gone through puberty and experienced elevated levels of circulating testosterone.” The court also reversed the lower court’s decision that found in the defendants’ favor on the equal protection claim and sent that issue back to the lower court.

West Virginia Governor Jim Justice signed the bill into law in April 2021, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the ACLU of West Virginia, and LGBTQ+ rights group Lambda Legal filed suit on behalf of the plaintiff a month later. Legal Director of the ACLU of West Virginia Aubrey Sparks celebrated the court’s ruling, stating, “We hope today’s ruling sends a message of hope to the trans youth of West Virginia… and a message of warning to politicians who continue to dehumanize this vulnerable population.”

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, however, said he planned to appeal the ruling. He stated, “We must keep working to protect women’s sports so that women’s safety is secured and girls have a truly fair playing field.”

West Virginia is one of 24 states that ban transgender students from participating in sports consistent with their gender identity. In January, the Ohio legislature overrode the governor’s veto of a bill that would restrict transgender participation in sports, but an Ohio court temporarily blocked that ban on Tuesday. Earlier this month, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers vetoed a bill that would require schools to separate sports based on students’ assigned sex at birth.

The post US appeals court finds West Virginia transgender sports ban violates anti-discrimination law appeared first on JURIST – News.