USA: Federal appeals court orders State Department to reconsider intersex passport application case

USA: Federal appeals court orders State Department to reconsider intersex passport application case

The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on Tuesday reversed and remanded a decision by the State Department rejecting an intersex passport application.

The State Department has historically applied a binary approach to identifying passport applicants based on their sex. In getting approved for a passport, everyone must be classified as either male or female. However, this has posed a problem for Dana Zzyym, who is intersex and does not identify as male or female. Zzyym requested a passport with an “X” for their sex because male or female would be inaccurate, and they supplied a letter from a physician confirming that they are intersex. The State Department denied the application. Zzyym challenged the decision by claiming in a lawsuit that the binary sex policy “exceeded the State Department’s statutory authority, was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act, and violated the U.S. Constitution.”

The district court that heard the case determined that the State Department had violated the Administrative Procedure Act and thus did not move on to analyzing the Constitutional basis of Zzyym’s claims. The State Department appealed this holding, and the Tenth Circuit subsequently determined that, while the State Department acted within its authority, its authority was carried out in a manner that was arbitrary and capricious. Their arbitrary and capricious holding came from the fact that three of the five reasons the Department gave for denying Zzyym’s request were not supported in the administrative record.

Ultimately, the State Department is permitted to deny passports for almost any reason. A major problem with their reasoning, however, was that they claimed the binary sex policy was partly a way to “promote accuracy and reliability.” The court held that “for intersex individuals like Zzyym, treating every applicant as male or female would necessarily create inaccuracies.”

Thus, the Tenth Circuit Court required the State Department to reconsider Zzyym’s application for an intersex passport.

The post Federal appeals court orders State Department to reconsider intersex passport application case appeared first on JURIST – News – Legal News & Commentary.

USA: Federal judge rules strip clubs eligible for emergency federal loans

USA: Federal judge rules strip clubs eligible for emergency federal loans

https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/05/federal-judge-rules-strip-clubs-eligible-for-emergency-federal-loans/

A judge for the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan issued a preliminary injunction Monday barring the Small Business Administration from enforcing a rule preventing “sexually oriented businesses that present entertainment or sell products of a ‘prurient’ (but not unlawful) nature,” from receiving emergency federal loans.

The rule also prevents banks, certain private clubs and political lobbying firms from receiving emergency federal loans that are guaranteed by the Small Business Administration as part of the Paycheck Protection Program (the PPP) in the CARES Act.

In his opinion, Judge Matthew Frederick Leitman found that the rule violated the intent of Congress in passing the PPP.

Simply put, Congress did not pick winners and losers in the PPP. Instead, through the PPP, Congress provided temporary paycheck support to all Americans employed by all small businesses that satisfied the two eligibility requirements—even businesses that may have been disfavored during normal times.

Leitman further clarified, “these are no ordinary times, and the PPP is no ordinary legislation.”

For more on COVID-19, see our special coverage.

The post Federal judge rules strip clubs eligible for emergency federal loans appeared first on JURIST – News – Legal News & Commentary.

New publication: International Journal of Human Rights (Vol. 24, no. 4, 2020) Special Section: Gender, Sexuality and Transitional Justice

The latest issue of the International Journal of Human Rights (Vol. 24, no. 4, 2020) is out. Contents include:

  • Special Section: Gender, Sexuality and Transitional Justice
    • Katherine Fobear & Erin Baines, Pushing the conversation forward: the intersections of sexuality and gender identity in transitional justice
    • Katie McQuaid, ‘There is violence across, in all arenas’: listening to stories of violence amongst sexual minority refugees in Uganda
    • Rocky James, An evolution in queer indigenous oral histories through the Canada Indian residential school settlement agreement
    • John Nagle, Frictional encounters in postwar human rights: an analysis of LGBTQI movement activism in Lebanon
    • Nicole Maier, Queering Colombia’s peace process: a case study of LGBTI inclusion

Australia: A 2018 police review of 88 suspicious deaths between 1976 and 2000 revealed 27 men were probably murdered because of their homosexuality, with cases peaking in the late 1980s and early 1990s – due to police inactivity first arrest only now

Australia: A 2018 police review of 88 suspicious deaths between 1976 and 2000 revealed 27 men were probably murdered because of their homosexuality, with cases peaking in the late 1980s and early 1990s – due to police inactivity first arrest only now

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/may/12/man-arrested-1988-death-scott-johnson-manly-sydney-north-head