Tag Archives: Africa

Ghana lawmakers reintroduce anti-LGBTQ+ bill imposing harsh restrictions

Ghana lawmakers reintroduce anti-LGBTQ+ bill imposing harsh restrictions

Lawmakers in Ghana reintroduced the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, a controversial and incredibly restrictive piece of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, to Parliament on Tuesday.

Presently, in Ghana, gay sex is punishable by up to three years in prison. The bill is seeking to impose harsher penalties for engaging in consensual same-sex conduct by increasing the maximum penalty up to five years. Additionally, criminalizing the “funding or sponsorship for prohibited activities” and “advocacy, support” and promotion for LGBTQ+ rights or organizations, the bill imposes a term of imprisonment between five to ten years.

Introduced in 2021 as the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanian Family Values Bill, Ghana’s parliament passed the bill on February 28, 2024. However, former President Nana Akufo-Addo declined to sign the bill into law prior to the end of his term. The former president cited legal challenges as having prompted this delay, noting his intention to wait for the Supreme Court’s decision. Cases challenging the bill were eventually dismissed in December as the presidential assent was required to review them. Nana Akufo-Addo’s term ended in January 2025, resulting in the bill expiring without enactment.

President John Mahama expressed support for the bill during the Fellowship with the Clergy event on February 28, 2025, declaring, “I, as a Christian, uphold the principle and the values that only two genders exist, man and woman, that a marriage is between a man and a woman.” Referring to a conversation with the speaker of Parliament, Mahama asserted, “The renewal of the expired Proper Family Values Bill should be a bill that is introduced by government rather than as a private members motion, and it’s my hope that that consultation would see a renewed Proper Family Values Bill.”

In an interview with Citi News on February 27, 2025, Reverend John Ntim Fordjour, opposition party MP, confirmed the bill had been resubmitted, calling upon President John Mahama to provide presidential assent for its passing. Ten lawmakers sponsored its reintroduction, including MPs Samuel Nartey George and Emmanuel Kwasi Bedzrah from the National Democratic Congress, Ghana’s ruling party.

NGOs and advocacy groups such as LGBT+ Rights Ghana have expressed their concern for the impact on the LGBTQ+ community, admonishing the bill’s reintroduction as being “pushed by homophobic politicians and religious groups as means to promote oppression against Queer people in Ghana.” After its passing last year, Human Rights Watch researcher Larissa Kojoué stated, “The anti-LGBT rights bill is inconsistent with Ghana’s longstanding tradition of peace, tolerance, and hospitality and flies in the face of the country’s international human rights obligations.” She further noted, “Such a law would not only further erode the rule of law in Ghana, but could also lead to further gratuitous violence against LGBT people and their allies.”

The post Ghana lawmakers reintroduce anti-LGBTQ+ bill imposing harsh restrictions appeared first on JURIST – News.

BUSINESS STATEMENT ON THE ANTI-HOMOSEXUALITY BILL OF UGANDA

BUSINESS STATEMENT ON THE ANTI-HOMOSEXUALITY BILL OF UGANDA

As a coalition of global companies – including those with operations and employees in Uganda – Open For Business is concerned about negative impacts of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill:

● Firstly, discrimination against LGBTQ+ people has a detrimental effect on employees and runs counter to the interests of businesses and economic growth in Uganda. The evidence shows that policies designed to exclude minorities such as the LGBTQ+ community have a real cost – not only on people, but on business performance as well as national economic competitiveness. There is a strong economic rationale for better inclusion in Uganda.

● Secondly, the Bill, if enacted, will make it a crime to pursue policies of diversity and inclusion in Uganda by making it illegal to provide information and support to LGBTQ+ employees. Further, it will compel companies to report those perceived to be LGBTQ+ to the authorities.

This contravenes international standards of corporate responsibility and best business practices.

Context

We are a coalition of businesses from the technology, industrials, airline, financial services, healthcare, consumer products, entertainment and consulting sectors. This briefing is intended to express our concern at the Anti-Homosexuality Bill (AHB), which proposes harsh penalties for people perceived to be lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or non-binary (LGBTQ+) or those who support inclusion for LGBTQ+ people.

see the full statement here

click here for our press release

More: https://open-for-business.org/special-focus-uganda

UN humanitarian team expresses concerns over conflict-related sexual violence rise in Sudan

UN humanitarian team expresses concerns over conflict-related sexual violence rise in Sudan

The UN Humanitarian Country Team (HCT) in Sudan on Thursday expressed concerns over the rise in conflict-related sexual violence in Sudan.

According to the team, reports from Khartoum and Al Jazira showed that an increasing number of girls and women were abducted and subjected to rape, sexual capacity, and forced marriage. The HCT stated that food insecurity and water scarcity contributed to sexual exploitation and that the number of individuals who sought gender-based violence case management services rose by 288 percent in the first seven months of this year. In addition, the team stated that an increasing number of boys and men were subjected to sexual violence.

The HCT said that the use of sexual violence as a war weapon breached human rights and international humanitarian law. The team urged all parties to the conflict to cease violent acts and conform to their legal obligations under international humanitarian law. The team also called on Sudan authorities “to take immediate action to safeguard the lives, dignity, and well-being of women, girls, men and boys, sexual violence survivors, and female humanitarian workers.”

The UN issued a dire warning on September 8 about the worsening crisis in Sudan, emphasizing the devastating impact of ongoing conflict and the inadequate international response. World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus reported that over 20,000 people have died since the conflict began in April 2023.

The conflict, a struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has created the world’s largest internal displacement crisis. Over 10 million people have been displaced from their homes in Sudan, including two million who are seeking refuge in neighboring countries. The conflict has ravaged Sudan’s infrastructure and health system, leaving 70 to 80 percent of the country’s healthcare facilities non-operational. Over 25 million people—more than half of Sudan’s population—are facing acute food insecurity.

On July 28, Human Rights Watch revealed an extensive report on sexual violence perpetrated by the RSF in Khartoum. The report highlighted that under international law, acts such as rape, forced marriage, or forced pregnancies constitute torture or war crimes and may also be considered crimes against humanity if committed as part of a widespread and systematic attack on a civilian population. The report also noted that international humanitarian law stipulates that access to healthcare and healthcare facilities must be protected in wartime.

The post UN humanitarian team expresses concerns over conflict-related sexual violence rise in Sudan appeared first on JURIST – News.

African Court on Human and People’s Rights defends socio-economic rights of gender-nonconforming and sex workers

African Court on Human and People’s Rights defends socio-economic rights of gender-nonconforming and sex workers

Advisory Opinion No. 001/2018 issued by the African Court on Human and People’s Rights on 4 December 2020 with a section entitled “Vagrancy laws and the right to non-discrimination and equality” includes paragraph 70, where the court explicitly refers to gender non-conforming people and sex workers in the following terms:

Against the above background, the Court notes that vagrancy laws, effectively, punish the poor and underprivileged, including but not limited to the homeless, the disabled, the gender-nonconforming, sex workers, hawkers, street vendors, and individuals who otherwise use public spaces to earn a living. Notably, however, individuals under such difficult circumstances are already challenged in enjoying their other rights including more specifically their socio-economic rights. Vagrancy laws, therefore, serve to exacerbate their situation by further depriving them of their right to be treated equally before the law.

The conclusion of the Court reads:

The court (…) finds that vagrancy laws, including but not limited to those that contain offences which criminalise the status of a person as being without a fixed home, employment or means of subsistence, as having no fixed abode nor means of subsistence, and trade or profession; as being a suspected person or reputed thief who has no visible means of subsistence and cannot give a good account of him or herself; and as being idle and who does not have visible means of subsistence and cannot give good account of him or herself violate; and also those laws that order the forcible removal of any person declared to be a vagrant and laws that permit the arrest without a warrant of a person suspected of being a vagrant are incompatible with Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 12 and 18 of the Charter;


https://www.african-court.org/en/images/Cases/Advisory%20Opinion/Advisory%20Opinions/001-2018_-_PALU-Advisory_Opinion.pdf