Author Archives: Andreas R. Ziegler

USA: Trump restricts access to gender-affirming treatment for transgender youth

USA: Trump restricts access to gender-affirming treatment for transgender youth

US President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Tuesday directing federal agencies to restrict access to gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth under age 19 and block federal funding for such treatments.

The order requires federal health programs to exclude coverage for gender-affirming surgeries and hormone treatments for minors beginning in 2026. Key provisions include directing the Department of Health and Human Services to review and rescind its 2022 guidance on gender-affirming care; requiring medical institutions receiving federal research grants to halt providing these treatments to minors; instructing the Justice Department to prioritize investigations into potential consumer fraud related to long-term effects of these treatments; and calling for new protections for employees wishing to report on noncompliance by their colleagues.

The order also directs HHS to conduct a literature review on treatment options for transgender minors — which it refers to as “children who assert gender dysphoria, rapid-onset gender dysphoria, or other identity-based confusion” — within 90 days and tasks the Justice Department with working with Congress on legislation to create a private right of action for affected individuals.

Implementation timelines vary by agency, with initial progress reports due within 60 days.

The executive order comes amid an ongoing national debate over transgender rights and healthcare access. According to the Human Rights Campaign, transgender Americans face significant barriers to healthcare, with 22% lacking health insurance coverage and 29% reporting being denied care by medical providers due to their gender identity. Transgender youth in particular face heightened challenges – research indicates that many identify across a broad spectrum of gender identities, and have historically struggled to access appropriate medical care and support services. While public support for transgender rights grew from 25% to 62% between 2014 and 2019, transgender Americans continue to face disproportionate rates of poverty, discrimination in housing and employment, and difficulty obtaining accurate identity documents that match their gender identity.

The issues of gender-affirming care and treatment options for transgender youth featured prominently in the 2024 election season, with Trump-aligned Republicans largely disavowing the necessity of such care.

The post Trump restricts access to gender-affirming treatment for transgender youth appeared first on JURIST – News.

Woman who refuses sex is not ‘at fault’ in divorce in France, ECHR rules

Woman who refuses sex is not ‘at fault’ in divorce in France, ECHR rules

European court of human rights (ECHR) sides with French woman whose husband obtained divorce on grounds she was only person at fault

See: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/23/woman-refuses-sex-not-at-fault-divorce-france-rules-top-eu-court

See: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng/#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-240199%22]}

https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{%22languageisocode%22:[%22ENG%22],%22itemid%22:[%22003-8140380-11404324%22],%22display%22:[2]}

Interesting Article: Clara Wellhäußer, Queer im Gefängnis – Warum der binäre Trennungsgrundsatz im Strafvollzug verfassungswidrig ist

Interesting Article: Clara Wellhäußer, Queer im Gefängnis – Warum der binäre Trennungsgrundsatz im Strafvollzug verfassungswidrig ist

SUGGESTED CITATION  Wellhäußer, Clara: Queer im Gefängnis: Warum der binäre Trennungsgrundsatz im Strafvollzug verfassungswidrig ist, VerfBlog, 2025/1/28, https://verfassungsblog.de/queer-im-gefangnis/, DOI: 10.59704/5954977d197c6893.

Read for free: https://verfassungsblog.de/queer-im-gefangnis/

USA: Trump bans DEI initiatives in federal government

USA: Trump bans DEI initiatives in federal government

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday issued an order prohibiting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives across federal agencies and directing the government to combat such practices in the private sector.

The sweeping order revokes several executive orders (EO) passed by the Democratic administrations in recent decades, including that of Lyndon B. Johnson, who served from 1963 to 1969, during a critical juncture of America’s civil rights movement. In the 1960s, Black Americans faced systemic discrimination that traced back to slavery and its aftermath. Though slavery had ended in 1865, Southern states had in its wake established racial-segregation laws and economic practices that deliberately kept Black Americans from accessing good jobs, education, and wealth-building opportunities. This persistent inequality sparked mass protests and civil rights marches across America, often met with violence, which ultimately pressured the federal government to enact reforms. Washington responded to the unrest with various policies aimed at dismantling such repressive practices, including the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, and EO 11246, a 1965 order requiring government contractors to take concrete action to increase the representation of minorities and women in their workforce.

Trump’s new order revokes EO 11246, along with — among other such policies — a 1994 EO passed by Bill Clinton (1993-2001) requiring the federal government to address environmental disparities impacting minority and low-income populations, and a 2011 order passed by Barack Obama (2009-2017) pushing for diversity within the federal workforce, among other directives.

In addition, the new policy requires federal agencies to identify “the most egregious and discriminatory DEI practitioners” across key sectors and develop enforcement plans targeting corporations, universities, and other institutions with potentially discriminatory practices.

“Hardworking Americans who deserve a shot at the American Dream should not be stigmatized, demeaned, or shut out of opportunities because of their race or sex,” the order states.

Under the directive, the Justice Department and Education Department must issue guidance within 120 days to educational institutions receiving federal funding on compliance with the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling that struck down race-conscious college admissions.

The order maintains exemptions for veterans’ preferences and does not restrict academic freedom to discuss DEI practices in higher education settings.

The policy delivers on Trump’s campaign promises to dismantle DEI initiatives, which grew to new prominence in 2020 following the killing by police of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, in Minnesota. Floyd’s death provoked outrage over enduring elements of systemic racism, including police killings, and sparked a national conversation about righting historical wrongs. Many companies and organizations enacted DEI initiatives in the aftermath of Floyd’s killing as a means of counteracting repressive policies.

Advocates have celebrated DEI policies as necessary for addressing historical inequities, while critics have slammed them, claiming they prioritize identity politics over merit. In a fact sheet accompanying Wednesday’s order, the Trump administration pointed to the latter sentiment, stating: “Many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences.” This divide emerged as a significant point of contention between often pro-DEI Democratic candidates and their increasingly anti-DEI Republican counterparts during the 2024 campaign season.

The post Trump bans DEI initiatives in federal government appeared first on JURIST – News.

International Criminal Court: Prosecutor Karim Khan applied for arrest warrants for two senior Taliban officials because of persecution of LGBTQI+ community

International Criminal Court: Prosecutor Karim Khan applied for arrest warrants for two senior Taliban officials because of persecution of LGBTQI+ community

On Thursday, ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan applied for arrest warrants for two senior Taliban officials: Supreme Leader Haibatullah Akhundzada and Supreme Court Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani.

They are accused of crimes against humanity on the grounds of gender-based persecution under the Rome Statute of the court, which sets out the duty of every State signatory to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes.

These applications recognise that Afghan women and girls as well as the LGBTQI+ community are facing an unprecedented, unconscionable and ongoing persecution by the Taliban,” Mr. Khan said in a statement.

More: https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/01/1159366

USA: Trump makes ‘two sexes’ official and scraps diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) policies

USA: Trump makes ‘two sexes’ official and scraps diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) policies

US President Donald Trump issued executive orders shortly after he was sworn in to change the US government’s policies on gender and diversity, following through on promises he made on the campaign trail.

He rolled back orders from the Biden administration that the Trump White House called “unpopular, inflationary, illegal, and radical practices within every agency and office of the Federal Government”.

More: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czx84en1yp4o

The Austrian Administrative Supreme Court prohibited legal gender recognition in a judgment of 5 December 2024 (VwGH 05.12.2024, Ro 2023/01/0008)

The Austrian Administrative Supreme Court prohibited legal gender recognition in a judgment of 5 December 2024 (VwGH 05.12.2024, Ro 2023/01/0008)

Entries in the civil register, in birth certificates, passports, id-cards etc must, from now on, display biological sex only.

After Russia, Hungary and Bulgaria Austrian is the 4th country abolishing legal gender recognition. 

See: https://www.rklambda.at/news/wie-in-russland-und-ungarn-verwaltungsgerichtshof-verbietet-die-rechtliche-anerkennung-von-transpersonen