Category Archives: Allgemein

UK: Football Assocation requires trans men to say they are ‘biologically female’

UK: Football Assocation requires trans men to say they are ‘biologically female’

  • 8 July 2025

The Football Association’s updated requirements for transgender men who want to play in male sport requires players to agree they are a “biological female” and “have a greater risk of injury when playing against adult biological males”.

The FA changed its rules on trans people’s participation in English football earlier this year following the UK Supreme Court’s ruling on 16 April that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex.

While transgender women have been banned from female football in FA-affiliated competitions since 1 June, trans men are still allowed to play in men’s matches.

However they must fill out a statement, available from the FA since June following the policy coming into place, declaring they are transgender and more liable to be injured than other players.

More: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cvg89449lv7o

Ukraine: Kyiv court sets precedent by recognizing marriage rights for queer couple, challenges Foreign Ministry stance 

Ukraine: Kyiv court sets precedent by recognizing marriage rights for queer couple, challenges Foreign Ministry stance 

A Kyiv court has officially recognized the same-sex partnership of a Ukrainian diplomat and his longtime partner as a family, the news outlet Bukvy posted on Instagram on July 3.

The Desnianskyi District Court ruled in June 2025 that the men, who married in the U.S. in 2021 and have lived together since 2013, meet the legal definition of a family under Ukrainian and European human rights law.

More: https://english.nv.ua/life/kyiv-court-recognizes-gay-couple-as-family-rules-in-favor-of-diplomat-s-same-sex-partner-50527272.html#goog_rewarded

ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II issues arrest warrants on gender grounds against girls, women and other persons non-conforming with the Taliban’s policy on gender, gender identity or expression

ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II issues arrest warrants on gender grounds against girls, women and other persons non-conforming with the Taliban’s policy on gender, gender identity or expression

Today, 8 July 2025, Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or “the Court”) has issued,  in the context of the Situation of Afghanistan, warrants of arrest for Mr Haibatullah Akhundzada, Supreme Leader of the Taliban, and Mr Abdul Hakim Haqqani, Chief Justice of the Taliban, who have exercised de facto authority in Afghanistan at least from 15 August 2021. 

The Chamber has found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Haibatullah Akhundzada and Mr Abdul Hakim Haqqani have committed by ordering, inducing or soliciting the crime against humanity of persecution, under article 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute, on gender grounds against girls, women and other persons non-conforming with the Taliban’s policy on gender, gender identity or expression; and on political grounds against persons perceived as “allies of girls and women”. These crimes are believed to have been committed on the territory of Afghanistan since the Taliban seized power on 15 August 2021, and have continued until at least 20 January 2025. 

Pre-Trial Chamber II considered that the Taliban have implemented a governmental policy that resulted in severe violations of fundamental rights and freedoms of the civilian population of Afghanistan, in connection with conducts of murder, imprisonment, torture, rape and enforced disappearance. While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms. Specifically, the Taliban severely deprived, through decrees and edicts, girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion. In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban’s policy on gender. 

In assessing the evidence before it, the Chamber has taken into account the object and purpose of Article 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute. This provision reflects the Statute’s broader aim to protect civilian populations from serious and systemic violations of fundamental rights, particularly those targeting vulnerable groups. In this context, the Chamber considered that the protection of victims of such crimes – especially women and girls who are often disproportionately affected by gender-based persecution – is central to the provision’s purpose. The Chamber found that gender persecution encompasses not only direct acts of violence, but also systemic and institutionalised forms of harm, including the imposition of discriminatory societal norms.

Furthermore, the Chamber found that individuals perceived as opposing these policies, even passively or through omission, were also targeted by the Taliban. This included those described as “allies of girls and women”, who were viewed as political opponents. 

The Chamber has decided that the warrants will remain under seal at this stage, in order to protect victims and witnesses and safeguard the proceedings. Nevertheless, the Chamber considered that the conduct addressed is ongoing and that public awareness of the warrants may contribute to the prevention of the further commission of these crimes. Accordingly, the Chamber found that it is in the interests of justice to publicly disclose the existence of these warrants.


For further information, please contact Fadi El Abdallah, Spokesperson and Head of Public Affairs Unit, International Criminal Court, by telephone at: +31 (0)70 515-9152 or +31 (0)6 46448938 or by e-mail at: fadi.el-abdallah@icc-cpi.int

You can also follow the Court’s activities on Twitter/XFacebookYouTubeInstagram and Flickr

More: https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-afghanistan-icc-pre-trial-chamber-ii-issues-arrest-warrants-haibatullah-akhundzada

The Brief – How Germany went from Pride to shaming diversity (Euractiv | THE BRIEF )

The Brief – How Germany went from Pride to shaming diversity
Germany has become a less hospitable place for minorities, even if its conservative-leaning society was never the liberal paradise that swathes of Anglo millennials mistook it for after popping a pill at a smoke-filled Berlin nightclub.

And its former leader, Angela Merkel – who voted against same-sex marriage – was never the liberal icon that international media mistook her for after the devout Christian opened the borders to thousands of refugees as a humanitarian gesture.

But where the pragmatist Merkel merely slowed Germany’s social liberalisation, the accession of Friedrich Merz to the chancellery has seen it switch from first into reverse gear.

When it comes to social and diversity politics, the staunchly conservative chancellor and his centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) have wasted no time in office marking their political territory.

Much of the controversy has centred around Berlin’s annual Pride parade, which the German parliament has marked since 2022 by flying the rainbow flag. Not this year: The new conservative president of the Bundestag, Julia Klöckner, a Merz ally, has halted the practice, citing concerns about political neutrality.

Shortly after, she prohibited the participation of the parliament’s queer staff network in the parade. In the latest upset, the Bundestag’s administration has ordered MPs to remove Pride flags from their window, with police sent out to enforce a mostly unenforced house rule, as revealed by Euractiv.

And it’s not just Klöckner: Merz himself has argued that Pride flags turn the Bundestag into a “circus tent” – somewhat unsurprisingly, after he had once answered a question on his stance on homosexuality with the words that it was a private matter “as long as it doesn’t affect children”. Merz’s education minister reportedly banned gender-inclusive language from her ministry’s communications. His interior minister has trained his crosshairs on liberalised naturalisation laws for foreigners.

This crackdown is certainly nowhere near Hungarian proportions, where officials have moved to outlaw Pride parades and queer freedom of expression. Participants in Berlin’s edition can still attend a typically raunchy public party, largely unbothered, followed by an equally raunchy after-party at (in some cases) publicly subsidised clubs.

But the CDU has signalled where its political priorities lie – and it’s at the expense of minorities.

It’s not difficult to find voices in the government who fear that this is not just a conservative pushback but a sinister political calculus.
Read more.

Hong Kong to introduce same-sex partnerships bill

Hong Kong to introduce same-sex partnerships bill

Hong Kong is set to introduce a bill that will recognise same-sex partnerships, in what would mark a major step forward for LGBTQ+ people in the special administrative region of China.

In 2023, Hong Kong’s top court ordered the government to legally recognise same-sex relationships and gave them two years to enact legislation. However, an appeal with regard to bringing forward full marriage equality and recognition of same-sex marriages performed abroad was unanimously dismissed.

While the government has shown little appetite for championing LGBTQ+ rights, homosexuality was decriminalised in 1991, and legal challenges have pushed the authorities to make improvements in terms of rights for LGBTQ+ people in general.

More: https://www.thepinknews.com/2025/07/10/hong-kong-to-introduce-same-sex-partnership-bill-lgbtq/?user_id=andreas.ziegler.ch@gmail.com

Semenya: ECHR confirms Switzerland violated athlete’s rights

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has upheld a 2023 decision that Switzerland violated the rights of South African athlete Caster Semenya. +Get the most important news from Switzerland in your inbox The judges found that the hyperandrogenic athlete’s right to a fair trial had been violated by Switzerland. As a result, the Federal Court’s review of the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s decision on appeal did not achieve the required level of attention. Two years ago, in a chamber decision, the ECHR upheld Semenya’s complaint on several points. In particular, it found that the World Athletics (WA) rules, upheld by the Swiss courts, violated the athlete’s right to privacy. The rules at issue require women with excess male hormones (hyperandrogens) to take female hormones in order to take part in competitions recognised by WA. Switzerland appealed the 2023 decision to the Grand Chamber of the ECHR. Translated from French by DeepL/mga How we work We select …

More: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/various/switzerland-condemned-in-the-semenya-case/89659791

______________________________________

Judgment: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#_Toc201842496

_______________________________________

Caster Semenya’s ECHR win lauded as landmark case for athletes’ rights

Human Rights Watch (HRW) on Tuesday commended the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)’s decision in the case of South African runner, Caster Semenya, who challenged regulations imposed by World Athletics, the global track and field governing body that imposed discriminatory guidelines prohibiting women with Differences of Sex Development (DSD)  from competing in the female category unless they underwent medical intervention to lower their natural testosterone levels.

Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at HRW, said:

Caster Semenya’s victory is a victory for all women and all athletes because the European Court found that the Court of Arbitration for Sport and Swiss Federal Tribunal had failed to uphold human rights norms despite credible claims of discrimination.

Semenya had previously taken her discrimination case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, which is the mandatory and exclusive jurisdiction for disputes in the sports arena, in line with World Athletics’ rules. However, her case was unsuccessful in arbitration, which led to her appealing the decision to Switzerland’s Federal Supreme Court, which later rejected her appeal on narrow grounds. In coming to their decision, the Grand Chamber found that the arbitrary set of regulations imposed a severe interference with the athletes’ privacy rights, had never undergone the proper assessment on whether they are necessary or proportionate under international human rights laws, as a result of the prior tribunals which oversaw her case not carrying out a comprehensive review.

The Grand Chamber found that Semenya’s fundamental right to a fair trial, enshrined under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (convention) had been violated and chided the Swiss Federal Supreme Court’s disregard for the seriousness of the personal rights at stake, namely the impact of the DSD Regulations on her bodily and psychological integrity and identity, right to self-determination and right to exercise her professional activity as “inconceivable.” Judge Šimáčková aptly summed up Semenya’s circumstances, stating that:

In conclusion, I should like to emphasise that the applicant was at a disadvantage vis-à-vis the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), not only as a professional athlete, for the reasons set out in the present judgment, but also because she is a woman, she is black, and she is from the Global South.

Her remarks are particularly important as they underscore the evolving understanding in international human rights law that true equality requires acknowledging how overlapping forms of discrimination, such as race, gender, and geography, compound disadvantage within institutional frameworks. The dismissal of medical evidence adduced by experts in the first two trials as to the invasiveness and degrading nature of sex testing regulations is alarming, as it reinforces the archaic stereotype of there being only one metric for femininity and that individuals who do not conform to this standard are less of a woman. Other than not having a legitimate scientific basis, gender verification testing has also led to cases of misidentifying individuals with genetic variations as ineligible for competition, leading to a public smear campaign.

The post Caster Semenya’s ECHR win lauded as landmark case for athletes’ rights appeared first on JURIST – News.

Russia court announces ‘LGTBQA+ propaganda’ case against bookstore

Russia court announces ‘LGTBQA+ propaganda’ case against bookstore

A Saint Petersburg court announced a case Tuesday against the bookstore “Подписные издания” (Subscription Publications) on charges of “LGBTQA+ propaganda.” No information is available yet regarding the reasons for the charges.

On its website, the bookstore shares that it has been open since 1926, with photos that capture the involvement of the store  with the people of the cultural capital of Russia. Besides selling books, the bookstore has two cafes and a stationery line, hosts events, manages a children’s literature club, produces lists of children’s books and a literary journal, and publishes novels.

The bookstore was already fined 800,000 rubles (approximately $10,000) in May under the “LGBTQA+ propaganda” charges for selling books authored by Susan Sontag, known to defend women’s rights, journalists Valery Panyushkin and Sergey Parkhomenko, who are identified as “foreign agents,” and more. The court also demanded the removal of the aforementioned literature.

The charge of “LGBTQA+ propaganda” against the bookstore is the latest issue in the journal of human rights violations under Putin’s regime. After labeling the LGBTQA+ movement as “extremist” in 2023, the government dedicated a huge amount of resources to punishing anything that resembled it. Companies like Apple have been fined several times for failing to remove undesired content. Bookstores and publishers have been targets of searches, detention, and fines. LGBTQA+ activists have been fined for social media promotions, with at least one sentence being issued for “LGBTQA+ propaganda.” Fines are also given out for messages in Telegram chats, with some people even being detained for posts in Russian social media VKontakte.

On Wednesday, a woman in illegally annexed Crimea was fined 100,000 rubles (approximately $1300) under “LGBTQA+ propaganda” charges for a meme showing men in wedding dresses. The meme depicted men who say “let’s split the bill,” “I waited for you to make a first move,” “why should I be the one to invite [a girl] on a first day?,” and “prove to and show me that you need me” as men in wedding dresses, establishing a connection between the phrases and self emasculation.

The post Russia court announces ‘LGTBQA+ propaganda’ case against bookstore appeared first on JURIST – News.

UN renews crucial human rights expert mandate on sexual orientation and gender identity

UN renews crucial human rights expert mandate on sexual orientation and gender identity

The Human Rights Council has renewed the mandate of the only human rights expert within the United Nations system that is specifically dedicated to addressing violence and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans (LGBT) and gender diverse persons.

More: https://ishr.ch/latest-updates/un-renews-crucial-human-rights-expert-mandate-on-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-2/

___________________________________________

The United Nations voted to renew the mandate of the Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) on Monday.

The UN Human Rights Council adopted the resolution with 29 votes in favor, 15 votes against, and 3 abstentions in its 59th session.

The renewal of the mandate for another three years reaffirms the core Universal Declaration of Human Rights principle that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” States are obligated to ensure the lives and rights of LGBTQ+ people are protected, enabling them to live free from discrimination and violence.

The mandate of the Independent Expert on SOGI was created in 2016 to address global discrimination and acts of violence committed against individuals based on their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Initially created for a period of three years, the mandate was renewed in 2019 and 2022. Since 2023, the mandate has been held by South African scholar, Graeme Reid, who previously acted as director for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch.

International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA World) Executive Director, Julia Ehrt, stated, “The renewal of this mandate is a spark of hope in a time when reactionary powers worldwide are trying to dismantle progress that our communities fought so hard to achieve.”

The United States, under President Donald Trump’s administration, withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council, issuing a series of executive orders earlier this year targeting the rights of transgender individuals. Rights groups have warned of the harmful impacts of such laws on transgender youth, their families, communities, and the healthcare system. Most recently, the US Supreme Court upheld legislation restricting access to gender-affirming care for transgender youth. The independent expert on SOGI issued a statement on the decision, urging that a “rights-based, person-centred approach to gender-affirming care” be upheld.

Ahead of the 59th session of the Human Rights Council, Human Rights Watch urged UN member states to support the renewal of the resolution. ILGA World delivered a statement at the session calling to “Renew IE SOGI” on behalf of a coalition of 1,259 NGOs and civil society groups from across 167 countries and territories. They noted that adopting the resolution would reiterate that “violence and discrimination against people of diverse sexual orientations and/or gender identities cannot be tolerated,” emphasizing that “specific, sustained and systematic attention” is necessary to address human rights violations perpetrated against LGBTQ+ people globally.

The post UN Human Rights Council renews mandate of LGBTQ+ rights expert appeared first on JURIST – News.

Germany: Berlin Administrative Court: “Progress Pride” flag allowed to hang in primary school nursery (No. 33/2025)

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin: „Progress-Pride“-Flagge darf im Grundschulhort hängen (Nr. 33/2025)

25.06.2025
Die „Progress-Pride“-Flagge darf im Hort einer Grundschule hängen. Das hat das Verwaltungsgericht entschieden. Kläger sind die Eltern und ihre Tochter, eine Schülerin einer Berliner Grundschule, die auch den Schulhort besucht. In einem der Horträume hängt an der Wand eine selbstgemalte „Progress-Pride“-Flagge in etwa der Größe DIN A3, wobei sich auf der linken Seite der Flagge ein Keil in den Farben rosa, hellblau, weiß, schwarz und braun sowie ein gelbes Dreieck mit lila Kreis befindet. „Progress-Pride“-Flagge darf im Grundschulhort hängen (Nr. 33/2025)Weitere Informationen