Registration is open for SOGI Law Summer School 2025

Registration is open for SOGI Law Summer School 2025

We are excited to announce the return of the hashtag#SexualOrientation and hashtag#GenderIdentity in hashtag#internationallaw (hashtag#SOGILaw) summer school between 21-25 July this year, with the tremendous support of Prof. Andreas R. Ziegler as its new academic coordinator. Having a background in law, economics, and politics, Prof. Ziegler is the President of the Swiss Society of International Law as well as a Full Professor at the University of Lausanne who was the leading force behind the publication of the hashtag#OxfordHandbookonLGBTILaw 2025 (hashtag#SOGIESC)

We also take this opportunity to express our deep appreciation to Prof. Kees Waaldijk, who founded the hashtag#SOGILawSummerSchool and led it for six successful editions, bringing together over 200 participants from all continents, and speakers from many countries. Despite stepping down from the coordinator position, he remains an integral part of the program as co-author of the Leiden Overview on SOGIESC in International Law and an honored speaker for hashtag#SOGILaw2025, all while fulfilling his role as professor of comparative sexual orientation law at the hashtag#GrotiusCentre.

Curious about what this year’s edition has to offer?

Visit our website and register now: https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/education/study-programmes/summer-schools/sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-in-international-law-human-rights-and-beyond

Switzerland starts process to legalise egg donation

Switzerland starts process to legalise egg donation

On Thursday, the Swiss government presented the broad outlines for legalising the practice. Currently, married couples can access sperm donation in Switzerland, but not egg donation. In 2021, Parliament had instructed the governing Federal Council to present a proposal to allow egg donation as well. + Get the most important news from Switzerland in your inbox For the Federal Council, both married and unmarried couples should have access to sperm and egg donation. “The current restriction to married couples is outdated and no longer corresponds to social reality,” it wrote in a press release. The draft revision of the law on medically assisted reproduction is also expected to incorporate other changes, including a relaxation of the maximum number of embryos that can be developed per treatment cycle in the case of in vitro fertilisation (IVF). The draft is due to be put out to consultation by the end of 2026. Adapted from French by DeepL/ac How we work This news story has been …

More: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/life-aging/egg-donation-should-be-allowed-in-switzerland/88801610?

USA: Trump administration rescinds sweeping federal funding freeze after court challenge (Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing)

USA: Trump administration rescinds sweeping federal funding freeze after court challenge (Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing)

The Administration of US President Donald Trump on Wednesday rescinded a directive to freeze funding across federal agencies just one day after announcing the sweeping measure, which had left agencies and beneficiaries scrambling to determine its impact.

Tuesday’s directive mandated a temporary pause on all federal financial assistance disbursements and obligations, including grants and loans, while agencies reviewed their programs for alignment with new Trump administration priorities. During this pause, agencies were required to halt new funding programs, stop disbursements under existing programs, and pause activities related to open funding opportunities, though certain legally mandated actions could continue with OMB approval.

The order was issued by way of a memo from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), an executive-branch office responsible for managing the presidential budget and oversight of agency spending. In the memo, OMB Acting Director Matthew Vaeth criticized federal spending under the previous Democratic administration of Joe Biden as the “use of Federal resources to advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies” and as a “waste of taxpayer dollars that does not improve the day-to-day lives of those we serve.”

But the directive lacked specificity that would help agencies and beneficiaries understand which programs might be eligible for exceptions, fueling anxiety about the breadth and scope of the order, including fears that programs critical for providing food and resources to the nation’s most vulnerable populations would suffer as a consequence of the order.

The order was supposed to take effect on Tuesday evening, Eastern US time, but a federal district judge granted an administrative stay, pausing the freeze for several days. The stay was granted in response to a lawsuit filed by the National Council of Nonprofits, which said in a statement: “This reckless action by the administration would be catastrophic for nonprofit organizations and the people and communities they serve. … From pausing research on cures for childhood cancer to halting housing and food assistance, shuttering domestic violence and homeless shelters, and closing suicide hotlines, the impact of even a short pause in funding could be devastating and cost lives. This order must be halted immediately before such avoidable harm is done.” The judge said the administrative stay would block the OMB from enforcing the directive pending arguments to take place next week.

Confusion continued to mount in the meantime, with questions about the freeze dominating a White House press briefing on Wednesday. During the briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said repeatedly that the order would not affect direct beneficiaries of federal programs, but was less clear on indirect individual beneficiaries, such as seniors benefiting from federally funded nutrition programs organized by third-parties. She maintained more information was coming.

Shortly thereafter, reports emerged that the OMB had released a brief memo rescinding its directive from Tuesday. Leavitt took to X (formerly Twitter) to confirm that the OMB memo had been rescinded because of the court order. She added the caveat, however, that Trump’s various executive orders on federal funding “remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.” The executive orders named in the OMB memo included the following:

  • Protecting the American People Against Invasion (Jan. 20, 2025), which revoked several Biden-era immigration policies while directing federal agencies to prioritize deportations, establish nationwide Homeland Security Task Forces, expand detention facilities, encourage state-local immigration enforcement partnerships, and review funding to NGOs that assist undocumented immigrants;
  • Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid (Jan. 20, 2025), which imposed a 90-day pause on US foreign development assistance disbursements while agencies review all foreign aid programs for alignment with the Trump administration’s foreign policy objectives, with the Secretary of State empowered to grant waivers and approve resumption of funding for programs that pass review;
  • Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements (Jan. 20, 2025), which directed the US’ immediate withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change and all related UN climate accords, revokes the US International Climate Finance Plan, and requires federal agencies to prioritize economic efficiency and American prosperity over climate commitments in international energy agreements;
  • Unleashing American Energy (Jan. 20, 2025), which mandated a comprehensive review and rollback of climate-related policies, including revoking multiple Biden-era executive orders, pausing Inflation Reduction Act funding disbursements, disbanding the interagency working group on carbon costs, expediting energy permits, restarting LNG export reviews, and directing agencies to prioritize domestic energy production and mineral development while removing restrictions on consumer choice in vehicles and appliances;
  • Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing (Jan. 20, 2025), which mandated the termination of all federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and Environmental Justice programs and positions, required agencies to document all such programs and contractors since January 2021, and established monthly meetings to monitor the elimination of these initiatives across the federal government;
  • Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government (Jan. 20, 2025), which defined sex as binary and biological, mandated federal agencies to use only these definitions, required identification documents to reflect biological sex rather than gender identity, prohibited federal funding related to “gender ideology,” directed changes to prison housing policies based on biological sex, and rescinded multiple Biden-era policies and guidance documents related to gender identity protections; and
  • Enforcing the Hyde Amendment (Jan. 24, 2025). which revoked two Biden-era orders related to abortion access and directed the OMB to issue guidance ensuring federal funding complies with the Hyde Amendment’s restrictions on using federal funds for elective abortions.

The post Trump administration rescinds sweeping federal funding freeze after court challenge appeared first on JURIST – News.

USA: Trump restricts access to gender-affirming treatment for transgender youth

USA: Trump restricts access to gender-affirming treatment for transgender youth

US President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Tuesday directing federal agencies to restrict access to gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth under age 19 and block federal funding for such treatments.

The order requires federal health programs to exclude coverage for gender-affirming surgeries and hormone treatments for minors beginning in 2026. Key provisions include directing the Department of Health and Human Services to review and rescind its 2022 guidance on gender-affirming care; requiring medical institutions receiving federal research grants to halt providing these treatments to minors; instructing the Justice Department to prioritize investigations into potential consumer fraud related to long-term effects of these treatments; and calling for new protections for employees wishing to report on noncompliance by their colleagues.

The order also directs HHS to conduct a literature review on treatment options for transgender minors — which it refers to as “children who assert gender dysphoria, rapid-onset gender dysphoria, or other identity-based confusion” — within 90 days and tasks the Justice Department with working with Congress on legislation to create a private right of action for affected individuals.

Implementation timelines vary by agency, with initial progress reports due within 60 days.

The executive order comes amid an ongoing national debate over transgender rights and healthcare access. According to the Human Rights Campaign, transgender Americans face significant barriers to healthcare, with 22% lacking health insurance coverage and 29% reporting being denied care by medical providers due to their gender identity. Transgender youth in particular face heightened challenges – research indicates that many identify across a broad spectrum of gender identities, and have historically struggled to access appropriate medical care and support services. While public support for transgender rights grew from 25% to 62% between 2014 and 2019, transgender Americans continue to face disproportionate rates of poverty, discrimination in housing and employment, and difficulty obtaining accurate identity documents that match their gender identity.

The issues of gender-affirming care and treatment options for transgender youth featured prominently in the 2024 election season, with Trump-aligned Republicans largely disavowing the necessity of such care.

The post Trump restricts access to gender-affirming treatment for transgender youth appeared first on JURIST – News.

Woman who refuses sex is not ‘at fault’ in divorce in France, ECHR rules

Woman who refuses sex is not ‘at fault’ in divorce in France, ECHR rules

European court of human rights (ECHR) sides with French woman whose husband obtained divorce on grounds she was only person at fault

See: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/23/woman-refuses-sex-not-at-fault-divorce-france-rules-top-eu-court

See: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng/#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-240199%22]}

https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{%22languageisocode%22:[%22ENG%22],%22itemid%22:[%22003-8140380-11404324%22],%22display%22:[2]}

Interesting Article: Clara Wellhäußer, Queer im Gefängnis – Warum der binäre Trennungsgrundsatz im Strafvollzug verfassungswidrig ist

Interesting Article: Clara Wellhäußer, Queer im Gefängnis – Warum der binäre Trennungsgrundsatz im Strafvollzug verfassungswidrig ist

SUGGESTED CITATION  Wellhäußer, Clara: Queer im Gefängnis: Warum der binäre Trennungsgrundsatz im Strafvollzug verfassungswidrig ist, VerfBlog, 2025/1/28, https://verfassungsblog.de/queer-im-gefangnis/, DOI: 10.59704/5954977d197c6893.

Read for free: https://verfassungsblog.de/queer-im-gefangnis/

USA: Trump bans DEI initiatives in federal government

USA: Trump bans DEI initiatives in federal government

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday issued an order prohibiting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives across federal agencies and directing the government to combat such practices in the private sector.

The sweeping order revokes several executive orders (EO) passed by the Democratic administrations in recent decades, including that of Lyndon B. Johnson, who served from 1963 to 1969, during a critical juncture of America’s civil rights movement. In the 1960s, Black Americans faced systemic discrimination that traced back to slavery and its aftermath. Though slavery had ended in 1865, Southern states had in its wake established racial-segregation laws and economic practices that deliberately kept Black Americans from accessing good jobs, education, and wealth-building opportunities. This persistent inequality sparked mass protests and civil rights marches across America, often met with violence, which ultimately pressured the federal government to enact reforms. Washington responded to the unrest with various policies aimed at dismantling such repressive practices, including the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, and EO 11246, a 1965 order requiring government contractors to take concrete action to increase the representation of minorities and women in their workforce.

Trump’s new order revokes EO 11246, along with — among other such policies — a 1994 EO passed by Bill Clinton (1993-2001) requiring the federal government to address environmental disparities impacting minority and low-income populations, and a 2011 order passed by Barack Obama (2009-2017) pushing for diversity within the federal workforce, among other directives.

In addition, the new policy requires federal agencies to identify “the most egregious and discriminatory DEI practitioners” across key sectors and develop enforcement plans targeting corporations, universities, and other institutions with potentially discriminatory practices.

“Hardworking Americans who deserve a shot at the American Dream should not be stigmatized, demeaned, or shut out of opportunities because of their race or sex,” the order states.

Under the directive, the Justice Department and Education Department must issue guidance within 120 days to educational institutions receiving federal funding on compliance with the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling that struck down race-conscious college admissions.

The order maintains exemptions for veterans’ preferences and does not restrict academic freedom to discuss DEI practices in higher education settings.

The policy delivers on Trump’s campaign promises to dismantle DEI initiatives, which grew to new prominence in 2020 following the killing by police of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, in Minnesota. Floyd’s death provoked outrage over enduring elements of systemic racism, including police killings, and sparked a national conversation about righting historical wrongs. Many companies and organizations enacted DEI initiatives in the aftermath of Floyd’s killing as a means of counteracting repressive policies.

Advocates have celebrated DEI policies as necessary for addressing historical inequities, while critics have slammed them, claiming they prioritize identity politics over merit. In a fact sheet accompanying Wednesday’s order, the Trump administration pointed to the latter sentiment, stating: “Many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences.” This divide emerged as a significant point of contention between often pro-DEI Democratic candidates and their increasingly anti-DEI Republican counterparts during the 2024 campaign season.

The post Trump bans DEI initiatives in federal government appeared first on JURIST – News.